Advocates see it as a step towards enhancing border security and modernizing asylum procedures, aiming to streamline immigration processes and bolster enforcement. However, critics argue it falls short in key areas: it's seen as insufficient in securing the border, lacking rigorous measures for more selective entry, and not addressing broader immigration system reforms. This bill also faces scrutiny for combining immigration issues with unrelated international funding, muddying its focus. This controversy underscores the challenging balance between securing borders, ensuring fair immigration practices, and addressing the diverse needs of migrants, residents, the nation's workforce, and our overall productivity and humanity. PolicyKeys is a ROLE-PLAYING GAME. Predict whether each Role (click) will have a majority say (click) YES or NO. Finish all 8 roles, and (click) submit the see POLI THE AI's and the Editors' Answers.